Honorary lecturer’s expertise recognised in Court of Appeal decision
Celebrating our honorary lecturers— Steve Flynn is marking 25 years of inspiring legal minds at Te Kauhanganui Tātai Ture—Faculty of Law.
It may not be the most high-tech teaching tool, but Steve Flynn’s trusty yellow smiley face squish ball has helped well over a thousand Te Herenga Waka students get their heads around banking and finance law over the past quarter of a century.
Steve is marking 25 years as an honorary lecturer at Te Kauhanganui Tātai Ture—the Faculty of Law, where he teaches fourth-year students the ins and outs of lending and security.
When he’s not throwing a squishy ball around the lecture theatre, he is a consultant at Simpson Grierson, specialising in restructuring, insolvency, and securities law. Steve is regarded as one of New Zealand’s most experienced lawyers in that sector—he acts regularly for prominent corporate insolvency practitioners, and provides companies and their boards with restructuring and insolvency advice.
Steve grew up in the Hutt Valley, and was the first from either side of his family to attend university. After finishing his LLB(Hons) from Victoria in 1982, he was snapped up by Wellington firm Brandons.
“I got to work in the banking and finance side of things pretty early on. At that stage Wellington seemed like the centre of the universe, and was where all the banks and insurance companies were based,” he says. “Then Brandons merged and became Brandon Brookfield, which gave us access to clients like Brierley Investments Limited (BIL), the most valuable company in the country at the time.”
That meant at the tender age of 25, Steve was handling enormous Euro bond issues—at one point he was left on his own to oversee a BIL deal worth a staggering £57 million. He must have done okay, as he was made partner in 1987, at 27 years old. A number of Wellington partners from Brandon Brookfield later joined Simpson Grierson, where Steve has been ever since.
One day in 2000, Steve received a phone call out of the blue asking him if he would consider teaching banking and finance law at the University. It was a subject he knew, and because of his experience he felt there was a reasonable chance he could teach it.
Steve says the course covers New Zealand law, but many of the principles are relevant across the world.
“Banking law is popular with international students—it’s a well-subscribed course. We’d average around 60 to 70 students each year it’s been offered, which means there are around 1200 minds out there that might have some of my thinking embedded in them,” he laughs.
All those minds will no doubt remember Steve’s smiley face squish ball, which has been a key part of his teaching arsenal since he started back in 2000.
“A lot of what we talk about in class invokes taking security over ‘stuff’. To illustrate some of those points—for example, how title passes and doesn’t pass—it’s a lot easier to have some ‘stuff’ to talk about,” explains Steve. “So I throw the squish ball to Mr X, who ‘buys’ it off me on certain terms, then Mr X sells it to Ms Y, and so on. So this little yellow squish ball flies around the lecture theatre.”
Steve’s deep understanding of the law around banking and finance was called into question recently following the release of two High Court decisons in the first half of 2023.
“These decisions, which recognised purchasers’ equitable liens, threatened much of my thinking, teaching, and commercial worldview—they struck at the core of what I thought I knew about our personal property security regime, so I felt I had to defend that,” he says.
Steve managed to “rip out” an article and had it published by the New Zealand Law Society’s Property Lawyer magazine in August 2023. It was also picked up by an Australian publisher, the Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice. The appeal ended up being heard in Wellington before three Court of Appeal judges in November 2023.
“The Court of Appeal decision finally came out in October this year [2024], and the court very kindly referred to my article no fewer than six times! Not that I’m counting,” laughs Steve. “The decision validated what I’d said in the article and restored orthodoxy to this area of the law, so as an exercise it was well worth doing.
“It was a risk putting it all out there—if my description of the law was wrong, that would’ve meant the foundations of everything I’ve taught for the last 25 years was flawed. My reputation was at stake, so it was a big relief that the Court of Appeal not only shared my view of the law but cited my work to the extent they did.”
Happily for the future of law in Aotearoa, Steve reckons he’s definitely got another few years of teaching in him.
“I really enjoy working with students—invariably you’ll get someone looking at an issue in a completely different way from you, or they’ll ask a question that’s never occured to you before,” he says. “A good portion of them are smarter than I am, but what saves me while lecturing is that many of them haven’t realised it yet!”