Open innovation and the C-K method
The C-K method provides a structured approach to innovating that can stimulate science-based open innovation.
The BNZIC researchers identified that some project development processes are likely to be more effective and efficient than others. While research in this space is still developing, it is apparent that having a structured and theoretically defendable approach to forming open innovation science teams is crucial.
One approach that the BNZIC team has examined in detail is the Concept-Knowledge (C-K) method which is new to the New Zealand science innovation system. This methodology has been applied extensively internationally in a variety of contexts, including companies with large R&D units, research centres, industrial clusters and inter-disciplinary science teams.
What is the C-K method?
The Concept-Knowledge or “C-K” method is a theory of reasoning for situations that require innovative approaches. It provides a structured framework to facilitate the design of new ‘objects’ based on existing sets of knowledge.
It is particularly effective in generating new ideas and challenging existing thinking or approaches, helping to overcome rigid adherence to prior knowledge and explore alternative solutions to problems or issues.
The C-K method creates opportunities for new and radical scientific knowledge by integrating it into the collaborative process from the start. This is achieved through the interdisciplinary interaction between creative concepts (possibilities yet to be proven) and existing knowledge (that which is already possible.
How does the C-K method work?
C-K provides a structured framework that places creative thinking, learning, knowledge structuring, knowledge sharing, and innovation principles at its core. In other words, C-K controls for randomness and chance of innovation by making creative insight integral to the science-knowledge collaboration process. This approach creates numerous options that are made transparent and remain in play should they be needed.
This method uses a structured three-step approach that adapts to accommodate different types of participants e.g., technical experts, users, researchers, ‘lay’ stakeholders, and designers. At the end of the process, researchers will have a clear idea of not only whether their science is new and radical, but also whether it is commercialisable. This approach enhances efficiency by saving individual time and effort, enabling participants to make informed decisions about pursuing a project.